How to hype a ring: the ‘Edward de Vere’ ring and the evidence
an elizabethan ring and the evidence
How to hype a ring: the ‘Edward de Vere’ ring
Published Sept 4, 2026
Sometimes, I come across a piece of jewellery that puzzles me. The other day, I spotted a gold ring offered by Berganza London as the ‘Historic Ring of Edward de Vere’. Set with a carnelian intaglio depicting a male bust in the likeness of a Roman emperor, it is a beautiful and rare piece of Elizabethan jewellery.
But how do we know this is really the ring of Edward de Vere?
I started reading the description, then went looking for the archaeological find record. And somewhere between what we know about the ring and what has been suggested about its former owner, I felt the leap from evidence to interpretation had become rather large, and so I wanted to take you along to separate fact from story!
The Elizabethan gold ring and its intaglio
The ring itself is a gold ring, with a beautifully decorated shank and bezel in a foliage design. The ring is set with an engraved carnelian, showing a bust of a bearded man, wearing a coronet with large radiating points. This is an ornament borrowed from Roman times, when notably the god Sol was depicted with such a head ornament: they are stylized rays of sun. That fits with the time period the ring was made: from the 16th century onwards, people of the upper layers in society began to take an interest in Classical Antiquity. It’s a beautiful piece, and it is absolutely rare.
See the ring, a parallel, and a cast of the intaglio here
But on Berganza’s website, it is listed as ‘Historic Ring of Edward de Vere’ and the page title itself says ‘Elizabethan piece of jewellery Edward de Vere’. Edward de Vere was a confidant and favourite of Elizabeth I, which leads to the description of this piece being ‘an important piece of Elizabethan history’.
Wait, how did we arrive at this very specific attribution?
Where was the ‘Edward de Vere’ ring found?
For that, we need to retrace the find circumstances. Where did this piece of jewellery come from?
As mentioned on the website, it was found by a metal detectorist in 2018 ‘near Hedingham Castle in Essex’.
But what is ‘near’? That is a conspicuously vague term, so I looked up the Portable Antiquities Scheme Database. In the UK, metal detectorist finds need to be registered, and so there is a find record of the ring here. You’ll find it listed in the references below this blog. Side note: this record is not referenced on the Berganza site. The find spot is given as the Greenstead Green and Halstead Rural parish – so not an exact location, but the parish it was found in. That is not unusual, and I assume the exact coordinates of the find are known with PAS.
Hedingham Castle is not located in that parish, though, but in (unsurprisingly) Castle Hedingham Parish. That is roughly 2 miles from the parish boundary listed as the find spot, so ‘near’ is still an hour’s or so walk away.
The PAS record further lists that the find fulfilled the requirements of the Treasure Act, but was disclaimed as Treasure in 2020 following further research and returned to the finder.
Why has the ring been linked to Edward de Vere?
Now to the Edward de Vere part.
Hedingham Castle is the ancestral castle of Edward de Vere. And because it was found ‘near’ the castle, it was assumed to be associated with its famous inhabitant. The video on this particular ring shown on Berganza’s Instagram (see it here) even suggests ‘an intimate likeness’ between the carving on the intaglio and the few surviving portraits of De Vere.
So, a ring with an intaglio that was fashionable in court circles at that time, found a considerable distance from Hedingham Castle, shows an intimate likeness to a man of whom very few portraits survive? Dating a ring to the Elizabethan period is one thing. Attributing it to a particular Elizabethan individual requires another level of evidence, I think.
To be fair, Berganza is appropriately careful in their wording. The description uses phrases such as ‘it has been suggested’ and ‘thought to have been commissioned and owned’, so the connection with Edward de Vere is never explicitly presented as established fact. I appreciate that distinction.
At the same time, the overall presentation points quite strongly in that direction. The ring is listed as the ‘Historic Ring of Edward de Vere’ in the listing page’s title tag you see in your browser’s tab, the page title identifies it as an ‘Elizabethan piece of jewellery Edward de Vere’, and the description concludes: ‘We rarely acquire a piece so historically connected and in such remarkable, museum quality condition.’
So while the individual claims are carefully qualified, the cumulative effect is rather more confident. A possible association gradually starts to feel like a provenance, but in reality, we do not know how historically connected this ring is.
And there is more!
From Edward de Vere to Shakespeare
There is a theory that Edward de Vere is actually none other than William Shakespeare: William Shakespeare would have been the pseudonym under which he penned famous works such as Macbeth.
And here the layers of possibility start to pile up. We have a ring that might be associated with Edward de Vere, based largely on where it was found and a suggested resemblance in the intaglio. De Vere, in turn, might, according to the Oxfordian theory, have written the works attributed to William Shakespeare.
That is overdoing it, I feel, as there is no solid evidence for the first claim to begin with.
What can we actually say about this ring?
None of this makes the ring itself any less fascinating. It is a rare and beautiful piece of Elizabethan jewellery, found in Essex and recorded through the Portable Antiquities Scheme. But there is a difference between what we know and what we would like to know. A find spot in the wider vicinity of Hedingham Castle does not by itself connect the ring to Edward de Vere, and a perceived resemblance in an intaglio is not the same as an identified portrait. Taking the next step, from Edward de Vere to Shakespeare, moves us further still from the evidence.
And that is exactly what interests me here: not whether someone has technically claimed that Edward de Vere owned this ring, because they have not, but how easy it is to arrive at a compelling association that the available evidence cannot actually confirm.
And that is why provenance matters so much. Objects acquire stories remarkably easily, especially when a famous name can be found to hitch the tale onto. And if it is repeated often enough, a possibility quickly turns into an attribution, and an attribution then becomes apparent fact. Key takeaway from this piece of jewellery: read a description carefully and separate established fact from (admittedly!) intriguing possibility.
Personally, I think this ring is interesting enough without the hype!
—
Find out more about the meaning of personal adornment in the e-courses!
More posts on jewellery and adornment? Browse them all here!
Join the Jewellery List and receive new articles, jewellery news and more in your inbox!
—
References
PAS record: Flynn, S. (2018) ESS-A69E73: Post Medieval finger-ring. Web page available at https://finds.org.uk/pas/recorded-find/ESS-A69E73 under a CC-BY licence [Accessed: 04 Sep 2026 09:52:38]
Berganza listing: https://www.berganza.com/knowledge/extraordinary-jewellery/pieces-of-interest/important-piece-of-elizabethan-history [Accessed September 4th, 2026]
S. van Roode, [write the title as you see it above this post], published on the Bedouin Silver website [paste the exact link to this article], accessed on [the date you are reading this article and decided it was useful for you].
The Bedouin Silver Jewellery Blog: Sigrid van Roode
Sigrid van Roode is an archeologist, ethnographer and jewellery historian. Her main field of expertise is jewellery from North Africa and Southwest Asia, as well as archaeological and archaeological revival jewellery. She has authored several books on jewellery, and obtained her PhD at Leiden University on jewellery, informal ritual and collections. Sigrid has lectured for the National Museum of Antiquities in Leiden, Turquoise Mountain Jordan, and many others. She provides consultancy and research on jewellery collections for both museums and private collections, teaches courses and curates exhibitions. She is not involved in the business of buying and selling jewellery, and focuses on research, knowledge production, and education only. Sigrid strongly believes in accessibility of knowledge, and aims to provide reliable and trustworthy content: that’s why the Bedouin Silver blog provides references and citations.
This blog is free: if you’d like to support independent, self-funded research, please consider enrolling in a course or a jewellery talk, or donate here directly.
The proceeds directly support travel costs, book purchases, and the time needed to wite articles like this one: thank you so much for your support!












